Skip to content
VapeExperts

About VapeExperts

VapeExperts is an independent cannabis vaporizer review site. We buy every vape ourselves at retail, publish scores anyone can recalculate, and compare prices across retailers so you pay less for the right one.

We've tested 50 vaporizers the same way: at least 14 days of daily use, thermocouple checks wherever a vape shows a temperature, battery cycles to depletion on battery-powered models, and heat-up timed with a stopwatch. No review samples, no loaners, no paid placements.

Why Pen Names

Cannabis still carries legal consequences and professional stigma in most of the world. We publish under pen names to protect ourselves and our families. The backgrounds and credentials below are real. The names are not. We think that's a fair trade, and we'd rather be upfront about it than pretend.

The Team

Hunter Thomas

Hunter Thomas

Industry & Policy Reporter

Hunter covers cannabis regulation, market research, and the business side of the vaporizer industry across Europe and North America. He has followed legalization efforts in over a dozen countries and maintains contacts with regulatory bodies, trade groups, and market analysts.

Cannabis policy reporting since 2019 · Contacts in regulatory bodies across 12+ markets · Former trade policy analyst

James Marshall

James Marshall

Hardware Editor

James leads device evaluation at VapeExperts. He has logged thousands of hours testing vaporizers with thermocouple rigs, battery cycling equipment, and controlled draw measurements. Every score on this site passes through his testing bench before publication.

50+ devices tested with instrumented methodology · Background in electrical engineering · Consumer electronics testing since 2020

Carl Sager

Carl Sager

Guides & Education Editor

Carl writes the guides, explainers, and educational content that helps new and experienced users get more from cannabis vaporizers. He translates academic research into practical advice, covering everything from temperature science to consumption technique.

Cannabis science communicator since 2020 · Former health and science educator · Contributing writer across multiple cannabis publications

What We Bring

Hands carefully loading dry cannabis flower into a Volcano filling chamber, with the stainless-steel mouthpiece valve visible alongside

Deep Product Knowledge

We know heating systems, vapor paths and materials well enough to tell a real upgrade from a spec-sheet one, because we've used the vapes each new model is up against.

A person sitting on a sofa drawing from a Volcano Hybrid vaporizer placed on a wooden coffee table, in a softly lit living room with a warm peach-toned wall in the background

Hands-On Testing

Every vape gets 14+ days of daily use. We check temperatures with a thermocouple, time heat-up, run battery cycles to depletion and photograph the spent cannabis so you can judge extraction yourself.

Close-up of a vaporizer mouthpiece with orange lighting in the background

Photography

Our photographer shoots the vapes we buy: loading, spent cannabis, side-by-side size shots. Where we use a maker's image or an illustration, it's there to show a detail our photos can't.

Two Storz & Bickel Volcano desktop vaporizers (the analog Classic and the digital Hybrid) sitting next to each other on a wooden table with a green plant softly out of focus in the background

Comparative Context

Having tested 50 vaporizers means every new review benefits from direct comparison. We know exactly where a vaporizer sits in the market.

See our full testing methodology → · Editorial standards

How Our Scores Work

Every vaporizer gets a 0 to 10 score in five categories: vapor quality (30%), ease of use (20%), value (20%), build quality (15%) and portability or features (15%). The overall score is the plain weighted mean, with no editorial bump for anyone. See the weights and a worked example.

When a firmware update, a price change or longer use changes our view, we update the review and add a dated entry to its update log, so you can see what changed and when. See it in practice: our Venty review shows its "How we tested this vape" box and every dated update.

Transparency

Editorial Independence

We buy every vaporizer at retail with our own money. No review samples, no loaners, no paid reviews, and no manufacturer sees a review before you do. Our reviews combine hands-on testing with manufacturer documentation and cited sources.

Affiliate Disclosure

We earn commission from qualifying purchases through affiliate links. This costs you nothing extra. Affiliate partnerships never influence our scores. We recommend based on testing, not earnings. All affiliate links are disclosed and marked with rel="nofollow sponsored".

AI Transparency

We use AI tools to assist with research, drafting, and data analysis. All published content is reviewed, fact-checked, and built on our firsthand testing experience. The opinions, scores, and recommendations are ours.

Get in Touch

Questions or business inquiries: hello@vapeexperts.com · Corrections: corrections@vapeexperts.com · Corrections log